20 Others (2)
20 Others (2)
Fraudulent thought experiments on actions and existence
Consciousness seems to have three-dimensional volume
Matter must be materialized as flexible at the side of action
................
《 Fraudulent thought experiments on actions and existence 》
Though fraudulent, here are four thought experiments on actions and existence.
The point is that, even if steadfast matter doesn't exist there, the field behaves as matter actually if at least actions of matter exist there. In other words, regardless of the upper world or other universes, in this universe as a physical world, actions inherent in matter is the essence of the existence of matter or the existence of this universe. Matter actions embody matter and this universe. (By the bye, it is said that matter is equivalent to energy. Thereby, matter actions are presumed to be embodied by energy directly). Speaking reversely, it also means that, even if something exists there, if matter actions are not equipped in it, it can never behave as matter. Actually, such stuff can never exist in this universe.
By the way, there is a premise in the thought experiments here, and it is that this universe is a physical world.
Actions are dynamic and work spontaneously, independently, and actively. Such actions can also be called processes. Then, it follows that matter is a process working spontaneously, independently, and actively.
And, because matter is a process working spontaneously, independently, and actively, time macroscopically and seemingly looks like flowing. That is to say, it's converse. It's not that time flows a priori, but first of all matter actions as the true nature of matter emerge and the movement of them brings time. And, the true nature of matter actions is energy, and it can also be said that time is immanent in the primitive movement of this energy. Time doesn't exist as something transcendent like three-dimensional space outside existence. Conversely, it is immanent in the innermost place of existence.
And, consciousness of living things is formed fundamentally as macroscopic matter actions in the matter process which is the cause for giving rise to time. Since the true nature of matter is such a thing, the matter actions of consciousness can work and their movements can continue in the lapse of time. (And, it's surmised that something like a shadow of a continuing matter action is projected in the lapse of time and it would be perceived as bodily sensation or a sense of thought by consciousness). Everything cannot exist, let alone consciousness of living things, unless matter is such a process. Time also cannot exist, because there are no movements at any rate. Movements may also be the essence of entities. Actions and their movements may be the very things which are the essence of existence. And time is the derivative of fundamental operations of the matter action's process.
On the other hand, physical properties appear as the result of the matter action's work, and are static.
The following is the thought experiments.
1) First of all, let's suppose that there is not the very matter, but matter actions having physical mobility here. Then, the actions at once come to behave as matter completely. It's because the matter actions here are the fundamental actions of matter. Such actions cannot at all be distinguished in effect, in actual fact, from substances living things living in the macroscopic world imagine. As a matter of fact, matter is the matter actions. The matter actions are the true nature of matter, and the matter actions are matter.
2) Second, let's then suppose that here is some stuff having two actions, an action to claim volume as field and an action that has a subtle effect which brings mass to ordinary elementary particles indirectly by friction. Then, that is practically transparent being looked from other elementary particles, cannot be matter in a usual sense, and becomes the stuff that just forms space and hinders the move of matter. This is Higgs bosons. In other words, space is brought by actions and counted as matter in broad sense, but not regarded as matter usually because it bears fundamental duty peculiar to Higgs bosons differently from ordinary matter.
3) Moreover, let's suppose that there is something lacking matter actions completely here. It's possible to assume it to be matter in the first stage. In a word, it is matter which lacks of matter actions completely. Whether such matter can exist or not is not yet asked here. However, such matter gets more transparent perfectly than Higgs bosons and can never become a physical entity, because it doesn't at all interact with other matter. It cannot even form space. Therefore, it seems good to think such questionable matter doesn't exist, cannot exist from the very beginning. But it doesn't matter if it exists in other universes or other existential systems. Anyway, it cannot be observed.
By the way, these thought experiments assuming the existence of matter actions are so simple that we feel like we are deceived. However, it seems there is no use talking. It's because that's what actions are. It's because actions perform some works, and works are realized by dynamical movements. On the contrary, as to physical properties, things don't work out well. It's because properties are passive and static and brought by movements of actions. Moreover, substances human beings usually image can be said to be like physical properties. It's because the impression of matter human beings have is also passive and static and perceived by actions called interactions. So, from such impression, it can hardly be imagined that matter is equipped with such active actions as the ability of internal measurement or the matter actions. In the first place, an opportunity possible to notice it is unlikely. Nevertheless, it seems that the internal measurement (matter actions) works, and matter forms, sustains, and updates itself by itself in, for instance, Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, eddies, tropical cyclones, tornadoes, or various kinds of metabolism inside living bodies.
Here, let's try replacing "matter" in the thought experiment 1 with "consciousness".
4) Let's suppose that there is not the very consciousness, but matter actions of consciousness here. Then, the actions at once come to behave as consciousness completely. It's because the matter actions here are the matter actions of consciousness. Such actions cannot at all be distinguished in effect, in actual fact, from consciousness human beings imagine.
In short, if the thought experiment 4 is interpreted seriously, it follows that the true nature of consciousness is also matter actions.
However, in this universe, mere matter or space are brought a priori, and even if it was supposed that matter actions of them simply exist there, it's not so desultory --in the first place, they have already existed there before it is supposed--. However, since consciousness cannot exist simply, it may be too much to suppose that there are matter actions of consciousness.
Still, it seems that there is no use talking about the very framework of thought experiments 1 to 4. It's because, in any case, every movement in this universe can only be realized by physical actions.
This is a repetition, but the following can be seen from those thought experiments. That is to say, it's that, in this uneverse as a physical world, matter actions are the essence of existence and actions precede being. It's that if only there exist matter actions and the matter actions run, they can be matter just as they are. (Even time is brought by matter actions through the spontaneous, independent, and active movement of matter).
《 Consciousness seems to have three-dimensional volume 》
The sense of sight of living things consists of innumerable rows of pixels. However, it's strange that the image or concept about geometrical space is formed in the mental thing called consciousness.
It's because shapes are entity-like things. If consciousness is something completely mental and is not provided with physical aspect in the least, then it's hard to think that such consciousness can have an image or concept about physical and geometrical space without grounds. Rather, it's impossoble. It's because, since it's purely mental, it doesn't know fundamentally that there is a world of entities. It's because it cannot know about the physical world. And it's because it seems impossible that it has an image of a world of entities without clues.
If the stimulus by a physical event is only one bit, it's nothing more than a meaningless abstract. No geometricity appears. However, it's conjectured that, if the stimulus becomes two or three bits and they line up linearly for no reason at all or form a triangle, such thing somehow likely to make the primordial consciousness have a sense or a concept of space unconsciously.
Then, in order to line up geometrically the sensation sensed on the drawing paper for ideas inside the consciousness space, what should be done?
It's surmised that, if the consciousness space of primordial consciousness had been superposed on the three-dimensional space of a living body such as a cell, etc. originally, the consciousness space, namely, the drawing paper for ideas, had worn the three-dimensional geometricity from the beginning. Physical events occur at various positions of the living body, and, if the positions differ, the difference should bring some difference also in the perception of physical events. And, the perceptional difference about stimuli, in this case, comes to begin to teach primordial consciousness the geometrical spatiality vaguely. It seems that, assuming here for the time being that the qualia for the plural abstract sensation are equal, the subtle difference arising from the difference of occurring positions should certainly be contained in the sensation, and such difference by itself becomes the basis or foundation of geometrical spatiality consciousness imagines.
For this reason, it seems that the spatiality consciousness as a mental body recognizes is not the concept consciousness devised solely, but, fundamentally, is the reflection of geometricity the entity of a living body embodies. The positionality of points where the physical events occur on the surface of or inside the living body may be a basis or hint for shapes or geometricity consciousness recognizes.
According to these circumstances, it's judged that the geometricity consciousness recognizes had been worn already at the time of the occurrence of the primordial consciousness, as the three-dimensional space the living body embodies.
Thinking conversely, it can be conjectured that, if the primordial consciousness was able to understand the geometrical spatiality easily, it's because the consciousness was an entity-like thing having spatial volume in the first place. It seems that, since the primordial consciousness was such a thing to begin with, the consciousness, which is supposed to be mental about the action, was able to learn the geometrical spatiality intuitively without reason or logic. These things also strongly endorse that consciousness is one in body and mind with a living body.
On the other hand, it may be that the broad geometrical spatiality which is worn by such advanced sensation as sight or hearing is more refined, and is no longer bound by the shape of body or neural network, and is formed as an appropriative virtual space in particular.
For these reasons, living things with eyes are supposed to see things fundamentally by inferring through bit ideas which are converted from physical stimuli and copied to the virtual geometrical space inside consciousness. Visible figures of things are not immediate values. Nonetheless, owing to the accumulation of evolution over a great many generations, the inference should have come so reliable that it can tell the reality of the outer physical world almost as it is.
And all other sensation also should be relying on the inference on the whole.
Similar thing could be said about time. It's strange that consciousness which is shut up in a cell, being not given physical stimuli, can have an idea about time without grounds. Rather, it's impossible. It's because time is something abstract. It also is invisible. Nevertheless, if the very consciousness as a huge matter action, which is a macroscopic physical phenomenon, is riding the great river of time from the beginning, although exceedingly incomprehensible time, consciousness could have corporeally sensed such strange thing unconsciously from the beginning, not being obliged to think the sense of time out on its own. Anyway, the idea of such elusive thing as time will never flash from nothingness.
Now it may come to the outcome that the sense of four-dimensional space of physics had been implemented in the physical existential aspect of consciousness by nature.
《 Matter must be materialized as flexible at the side of action 》
Substances are generally hard. For example, stones and iron are hard. Osmium (Os) and Iridium (Ir) are more hard. However, this can be expressed about particles --static traces-- observed as a result of some fundamental interactions, and is nothing more than macroscopic physical properties of substances are hard.
However, before that, in order that substances can insist on their hardness being implicated in some fundamental interactions, actions as matter must be alive and working staunchly. Figuratively, at the side of actions, such flexibility as enables at least fundamental interactions to work must be inherent in matter.
Furthermore, in order to activate the physical world, this universe, matter must be able to transform itself into other matter. And, to transform, actions as matter must be alive and working reliably likewise.
In other words, no matter how hard the materials are, at the microscopic level before insisting hardness, actions as matter are alive and work steadily and flexibly. Since matter is not stiff at the side of action, at the base level, it can be concerned with the fundamental interactions and insist on various kinds of physical properties. It can also transform itself into other matter.
By the way, it doesn't matter even if stiff matter in the action side --dead matter-- exists somewhere. However, such stuff, because it cannot be implicated in the fundamental interactions in this universe, becomes transparent and is not observed. And it doesn't come to exist in this universe. That's all. For example, let's suppose other universe superposes on this universe. However, if the fundamental interactions do not occur between both universes, both universes get transparent with each other and do not notice the other's universe. And, it follows that the other's universes do not exist mutually.
Moreover, by the way, it's one logic that matter at least must be so equipped with the fundamental interactions --must be alive in the action side-- that it can exist. Then, it follows that logicality is already built in the root of the existence of this universe.
