表示調整
閉じる
挿絵表示切替ボタン
▼配色
▼行間
▼文字サイズ
▼メニューバー
×閉じる

ブックマークに追加しました

設定
設定を保存しました
エラーが発生しました
※文字以内
ブックマークを解除しました。

エラーが発生しました。

エラーの原因がわからない場合はヘルプセンターをご確認ください。

ブックマーク機能を使うにはログインしてください。

Teacher’s ability to relate with students is more important than excellent knowledge.

作者: soso

The teacher needs an excellent amount of knowledge in order to teach students. However, I believe that being able to sympathize with the student is more important than the amount of knowledge the teacher consists of. The relation with the student will allow the teacher to stand to form the student’s point of view and will enable the teacher to conduct a more comprehensive class. Furthermore, being able to relate to the student will enable the teacher to take care of each individual student. Also, knowledge is an important element of being a teacher, but the extent of knowledge that the student need is limited depending on the educational level.

First, sympathizing with the student enable teachers to conduct a more comprehensive class. Teachers, who have the perspective of the student, will be able to conduct an understandable class. This is because, teachers were also once a student, and they understand that just informing a vast amount of information is not going to be a meaningful class. In order to make the student learn, the teacher understands that the class needs to be intriguing to all the students. For example, imagine two classes A and B. Class A is a class that simply informs a vast amount of information. In this class, the student is likely to get bored and overwhelmed by the amount of information. On the other hand, class B is a class where the teacher provides information and interactive activities for the students to learn proactively. In class B it is likely that the student will be concentrating on the activity and learn the subject without getting bored. Thus, class B could be only conducted, if the teacher has or understands the student’s perspective through sympathizing with him or her.

Next, relating to the student will enable the teacher to understand each individual’s learning progress. All student does not think the same way, and they all have a different speed of learning. Even though the student is taking the same class, this does not mean that all the students having the same level of understanding of the class. In order to seek each student’s understanding level, communication is essential. Via communication, the teacher will be able to understand what and why the student is having a hard time processing the content of the class to understand. Providing a test could be a substitute for this matter. However, I believe that communication face to face is the most precise way to examine the problem each student is having.

Lastly, the amount of knowledge the teacher needs depends on the educational level of the school. Depending on primary school, middle, high school, and university, the amount of knowledge the teacher needs to teach is different. For example, a primary school teacher does not require to have a university-level knowledge of science in order to teach an elementary student. This is because there is a limit to what the elementary student can understand. Furthermore, students do not need a vast amount of knowledge on each subject. I believe that school is not merely a place to inform mass information. Rather than informing mass educational facts, I believe that a school is a place for the students to experience and be exposed to each subject, and see which subject they are most intrigued. This is because not all subject is relevant in our life. Artists do not need knowledge of chemistry, and a retail clerk does not need knowledge or art.

In conclusion, I believe that relationships between students and the teacher are more important, rather than a massive amount of knowledge. The ability to sympathize with the will enable the teacher to conduct class form a student’s perspective, the relation between the students will enable the teachers to understand each student's level of understanding in class, and knowledge is no the essential factor of being a teacher in school. Thus, the relation should be prioritized over knowledge, when evaluating teachers. Considering the free educational material flowing on the internet and more knowledge are easily accessible via the internet, I truly believe that the quality of teachers is not based on the knowledge they have. In fact, the most valued aspect of the teacher should be the ability to inform students without letting them get bored in class.


評価をするにはログインしてください。
この作品をシェア
Twitter LINEで送る
ブックマークに追加
ブックマーク機能を使うにはログインしてください。
― 新着の感想 ―
感想はまだ書かれていません。
感想一覧
+注意+

特に記載なき場合、掲載されている作品はすべてフィクションであり実在の人物・団体等とは一切関係ありません。
特に記載なき場合、掲載されている作品の著作権は作者にあります(一部作品除く)。
作者以外の方による作品の引用を超える無断転載は禁止しており、行った場合、著作権法の違反となります。

この作品はリンクフリーです。ご自由にリンク(紹介)してください。
この作品はスマートフォン対応です。スマートフォンかパソコンかを自動で判別し、適切なページを表示します。

↑ページトップへ