Archive. Curious Domestic Crime №1
What is Curious Domestic Crime? This is how I define the misconduct of other people who themselves do not consider it a crime. That is, a sort of domestic, cozy, "good" criminals. Who are sincerely convinced of their kindness. They just need to "survive". In my language, "survive" and "kick out" are the same word. Is it a coincidence? Or watching life?
Please note that these events are taking place in a country I have invented. Moreover, in the world I made up.
Instead of introducing
I then recalled another theory, "in captivity" of which I was. Presumably located ... speculatively ...
Allegedly, the eye itself releases rays. The rays are reflected from the object, and then fall back into the eye, forming an image there. In my opinion, I even saw such a picture in a school textbook.
What if since then I started trying to "emit" rays from my eyes, trying to remember the text of the textbook? It's hard to say ... Or rather, I didn't think about it from this point of view ... I thought that I was straining my neck muscles, imitating the effort to remember the text I was reading. Or the teacher's words?
What came first? Reading or listening? That is, I first started trying to remember the speech of the teacher at school? Or did I start trying to remember the text I was reading first? What then became a habit? What makes the muscles tense? The sound of the teacher's stern voice, which makes me shudder, press my head into my shoulders and do my best to portray on my face ... but what's on my face - in my whole body there is an intense effort to remember every letter of what was said ... Biting, crushing sounds of the voice ... Loud, hysterical. What voices I just did not hear enough at school ...
What should a teacher do? How to get the attention of slobs? His weapon is his voice. How to enforce discipline? In the absence of a stick.
Now what? Is there a teacher's voice between me and my "independent thinking"? Rather, my personal reaction to the voice. To be sure, my muscular reaction.
Muscle barrier, wall. How can this wall be destroyed?
Relax? Nice technique, but it works with the result. That is, "after" the muscles have tensed. Plus time for stressing awareness. And you need "while" the voice sounds.
The wall ... Is there a clue here? How to destroy a wall?
Or maybe not destroy, but somehow differently? I built this wall. Trying to protect myself from the unpleasant timbre of the teacher's voice.
Maybe some kind of speculative theory that I applied in my imagination is working here again?
So the voice. Oscillation of air, acoustic wave. Let us recall the pictures of the propagation of sound waves from a school textbook. Sound frequency, timbre. Somewhere I have met such tuning knobs ... Timbre adjustment is a knob in the radio receiver. A sound wave causes something to vibrate in the ear ... and it travels along nerves to the brain.
In school, I learned to "mute" the teacher's voice by focusing on something else. That is, connecting the imagination. But the muscle reaction remained.
If you again try to bypass these sound theories with your own theory?
Let's try. Take my field theory. Suppose, just suppose that the transfer of information from person to person during a conversation is carried out not only by voice. However, there are already scientific theories for this. Communication with gestures, facial expressions and even smell. I need my own fantastic theory.
So field communication. I have a field, I am sitting in a lesson. The teacher has a field, he teaches a physics lesson. The vibrations of the fields are superimposed and instead of physics, I understand that I am a bastard. This is what the teacher really wanted to convey to me. He didn't get enough sleep today and in general he doesn't like me. His field informed me of this and I naturally tensed, expecting a blow. And I got it - a psychological blow. Transferred to me already by my field. Echoes of the teacher's field. Let me remind you, I'm in class. All is attention. Susceptible to the slightest hesitation emanating from the teacher.
Although the mood of the teacher could be guessed by the timbre of the voice, and by facial expressions, and by gestures and even smells. That is, quite scientific.
The next day, this teacher's lesson was doing well. But I tensed anyway, this time trying not to anger him. Now my field conveyed my mood to his field and he realized that I was a bastard. Again a psychological blow. And so it became a habit? May be...
Perhaps it was the other way around. I didn't get enough sleep ... and so on.
And until now, even with the word "physics", my muscles immediately react.
It seems like I've found another barrier between me and my "independent thinking".
Are these the teachers? The same barrier?
It is necessary, of course, to take into account the influence of other people on me. But I believe that this is largely my personal speculative link "teacher - subject". Why am I associating a subject with a specific teacher of that subject? Why is physics practically closed for me by the personality of a physics teacher? And one! Because he himself thought so (that "Physics" is him) - our fields have combined - has this idea penetrated into my field? Maybe ... Or I myself created this speculative bundle in order to now enjoy sweet revenge and ignore physics, thereby ignoring the teacher.
One way or another, these bundles will have to be removed. As I come across in my life one or another area of science.
How to clean? I still like the methods for work more than theoretical research.
So there are several ways.
1. Change of personal orientation. Having looked through books on physics, I was amazed to find that there are many other teachers.
2. Forming your opinion. One may ask: "In physics !? So for this you have to be a physicist !?" I believe that you can form your opinion even in anecdotes. Not funny? Correct the anecdote to make it funny. Especially in physics, where theories are often reversed. But before that, it is not bad to test item 1, otherwise the confrontation with the former teacher may reach a new level.
3. Creation of fantastic theories. This is the one I like the most. Gives itself importance. Helps to be a "researcher", overcoming the level of "follower". This is where my fantastic ideas may appear.
4. Field correction. This is one of the fantastic ideas. Even focusing on the concept of "my field" helps to jump out, for example, from suddenly surging emotions - "to control myself". Further, there may be correction techniques.
5. Transformation of an uncomfortable experience into a comfortable one. Find the positive impact of the event. For example, in this case (with physics) I am very glad that thanks to these events I did not go deep into the study of this science, but spent time on something else - I began to do what I am doing now.
6. Testing yourself for the presence of a psychological complex "annoy the teacher". Becomes a habit. I begin to do bad deeds, acquire "bad" habits. I try to "spoil" the mood of others. Here, by the way, the probable reason for my strange disregard of physical activity was revealed. This is not physics. Not all evil comes to me from there :). Again the resonance of the fields is only with a different teacher. Physical education.
Here I consider it necessary to note that this is not a "witch hunt". Don't hunt evil and terrible monsters. Teachers here act as ... teachers. I am looking for my personal attitude to the events of my life. And the teacher here is like a beacon, in general in his role. And I am very grateful to the teachers for this. Over the years, I still learn from them.
And the resonance of the fields is a necessity, an integral part of communication. And harmonization of fields is a practice, possibly useful for all participants in communication.
7. Avoiding personal orientation. Formation of an understanding of the subject regardless of the personality of the teacher, scientist, author of the book. This is practically meditation. How to separate Newton's law from the personality of Newton himself? After I formulated the problem, it became clear how? And it turns out to be easy? After all, this is the dependence of force on mass and speed. What does Newton have to do with it?
I'll tell you what. By linking a law, a principle, a theory to anyone's name, you confuse your nerve cells. Because you think at the same time about the "dependence of force on mass and speed" and a specific person.
In nature, an individual "thinks" mainly only about the leader of the pack.
I'll say it differently, so that it doesn't sound so offensive ...
To survive in the pack, you need to constantly be aware of the decisions of the leader. In order not to be punished by this leader. But what is most important? To catch the danger signal in time (approach of a predator, fire, pursuit of prey, conflict within the pack), since all information flows to the leader from the sentinels and from the rest of the pack.
The conclusion now suggests itself. If you keep the image of Newton in your head, then you expect from him not useful information about the structure of Nature, but a signal to escape or divide the spoils. Include survival instincts. You are waiting for ready-made solutions. And you, for example, solve the problem in physics yourself. And you need analysis, reflection. And in nature, only the leader of the pack can think, analyze and, most importantly, make decisions.
And now it is clear what stands between me and the memory. This is the position. More precisely positioning, status. My status as an ordinary member of the pack.
But what if you appoint yourself as a leader? The leader of his memory, his body. In order for me to receive information from the "sentinels of science" - the creators of theories and formulas. And also from the teachers who analyze and report to me the situation in the "jungle of science".
And by the way, who feeds scientists and teachers? Who buys the books? Who pays for the lectures and lessons at the school? Here is another contradiction that confuses your body. You actually support the person, feed, that is, you are the leader. But you literally put it in your head. As an authority in science. Like a leader. And do you want to remember the theory he created?
Here I will make a reservation. And throughout the conversation on this topic I will often stipulate that we are talking about the internal states of a person. That is, you need to become the leader of your body, and not seize power in a school class or student audience. That is, we are talking about the relationship between myself and my personality. And not about my relationship as a social unit. This is an attempt to remove the barriers between me and my memory. And not a revolution in science with the failure of the foundations.
That is, outwardly, nothing changes for me. I go out to the school board. I declare: "Newton's Law". But to my body (very quietly so that no one except me can hear) I whisper: "the dependence of strength on mass and speed."
So ... Now there is a problem. Another obstacle on the way to "independent thinking".
The leader is in my head. Which distracts from independent thinking, activating the ancient instincts of survival in the pack. Who is he? Who is this mysterious character?
Suppose, just suppose it's anyone who's stuck in their head. At the same time, we will stipulate that this is my initiative - to keep it in my head. The leader himself may not even know me personally.
Then freeing the head from the leaders is the path to independent thinking.
And what about the methods? Here, for example, you can apply the technique I once developed for switching between the right and left halves of the brain. What for? So it seems obvious ... If someone's image persistently crawls into the head ... And one half of the brain actively participates in imaginative thinking ... Now it is clear why this particular technique is useful here?
---
My neighbors are heating the house with wood. It's very economical ...
I usually try to get out of the village before the heating season. But now I was delayed.
It is impossible to go outside because the smell of smoke envelops me like fog, fills my lungs, settles on my tongue. I am sitting at home. I made a powerful hood that works inside the house, filtering smoke through the walls. The smoke is almost not felt.
The good news is, this was an instructive example for me. I myself heat the house with electricity.
---
About a month ago I was sold one sort of cheese instead of another.
An unfortunate accident?
Maybe ... Maybe I would have believed it.
But I got cheese at half what I paid for.
If I got cheese twice as expensive, then I could believe in an accident.
In addition, I got a piece of fairly old cheese. But perhaps this is a coincidence :).
But the sale of stale cheese instead of throwing it away, I will eventually highlight in Curious Domestic Crime No. ...
---
To be continued ...
Planned for writing (or is already in the draft):
--Curious Domestic crime №3
--Curious Domestic crime №4
--Curious Domestic crime №5
.................
