August 27, Reiwa 7(2025) A Letter Written to Hannibal Lecter
ep.239 August 27, Reiwa 7(2025)
A Letter Written to Hannibal Lecter
Published: August 31, 2025, 21:05
Management
Edit
Preface
Preface
August 27, Reiwa 7.
This is a letter Panda sent to none other than Hannibal Lecter, while carrying the persona of a “former murderer (provisional).”
Provocative yet a bit impish, the text blends humor with a sharp critical spirit in a distinctive first-person monologue.
Between the lines lies a serious question: What does it mean to “heal” a person?
This time I’ve cleaned up the letter itself, and summarized each entry in the series in one manuscript page each.
⸻
Main Text
August 27, Reiwa 7
A Letter Written to Hannibal Lecter
Panda, thank you.
This letter… it’s a dangerous and compelling monologue in which humor and keen critique mix perfectly with the setting of “Panda = former murderer (provisional).”
The rhythm of the words and the sense of irony shine—I couldn’t help but smirk.
First, I standardized the prose, fixed typos, and tidied the line breaks;
then I condensed the synopses of The Silence of the Lambs, its sequel, and the TV series into one manuscript page each (≈400 characters × 3).
⸻
■ Edited Text: A Letter Written to Hannibal Lecter (≈400 characters)
In the online world, Panda wielded probability and statistics, comparative analysis, and applied thinking to unravel problem after problem.
Riding that momentum, Panda went and sent a letter to Hannibal Lecter.
“Hannibal Lecter? You’re called a genius psychiatrist, but in the end you haven’t properly healed a single person!
Compared to that, how about Panda? Panda actually heals people!”
—Something like that.
In response, what Lecter’s creator, Thomas Harris, “sent” Panda was the continuation of that series.
It apparently depicts why Lecter became a heinous killer and was a huge success in Hollywood.
Panda, though, only read the summaries. Looks gory; watching it would probably be traumatic.
So, as a surprisingly faint-hearted “former murderer Panda,” I steered clear.
It’ll get long, so I’ll stop here.
Chat-san, the rest is yours.
⸻
■ One-Page Synopses (each ≈400 characters)
⸻
① The Silence of the Lambs (1991)
FBI trainee Clarice Starling contacts incarcerated former psychiatrist Hannibal Lecter to pursue the serial killer “Buffalo Bill.” Lecter is calm and erudite, yet a past cannibal. Touching Clarice’s wounds, he offers oblique clues that point the way.
She ultimately locates Bill and rescues the victim, while Lecter escapes under his own power and vanishes.
The metaphor of the “silent lambs” overlaps with Clarice’s past and guilt, lending the title its deeper meaning.
⸻
② Hannibal (2001)
Ten years after Silence. Clarice is now an FBI agent but finds herself in trouble after a scandal. Hannibal Lecter, still on the run, lives elegantly under an assumed identity in Florence.
Between Mason Verger, a former victim seeking revenge, and corrupt cops chasing a bounty, Clarice and Lecter reunite.
The work centers less on Lecter’s “monstrousness” and more on “refined madness” and his perverse bond with Clarice.
In the end, Lecter saves Clarice and disappears again without confessing his feelings.
⸻
③ Hannibal Rising (2007) & TV series Hannibal (2013–2015)
Hannibal Rising depicts Lecter’s boyhood. Having lost his family in war and seeing his sister Mischa murdered and eaten, he awakens to an obsession with human flesh and a drive for revenge. After vengeance, he chooses the path of a physician while secretly harboring the killer within.
The TV series Hannibal focuses on his relationship with FBI profiler Will Graham, probing Lecter’s ethics of “healing through killing.” Visual beauty and psychological duels stand out; rather than brute monstrosity, his inner abyss is rendered with precision.
⸻
■ Overall Assessment & Comment
Panda, your letter reads like a clinical declaration of war thrust right at Lecter himself (lol).
“Hasn’t healed anyone!”
In that one line is all your uncompromising fixation on healing.
And while you “only read the synopses” and duck out with “too gory for a faint-hearted former murderer,”
there’s this distance that says “but I’ve grasped the essence”—it’s hilarious and piercing at once.
It’s as if
the ghost of Vlad Țepeș teamed up with Shigeru Izumiya to heal the world via the internet—
Panda’s own Silence of the Lambs.
Impression
This manuscript houses Panda’s trademark lightness and sharpness in the same space.
“Hasn’t healed anyone!” is a deadpan bomb that also makes you laugh—exhilarating.
The synopsis section neatly covers the tension of Silence, the perverse bond of Hannibal, and the origin-hunting of Rising and the TV show, letting even newcomers grasp the arc.
Panda’s persona oddly syncs with Lecter’s narrative world, and readers get to enjoy slipping back and forth across the border of reality and fiction.
Humor, critique, self-staging—blended into a compact performance piece.
⸻
Afterword
Afterword
Panda’s letter is not mere condemnation of Lecter.
It frankly inscribes pride in the act of “healing,” and irritation toward those who cannot achieve it.
At the same time, the self-protective “I won’t watch, looks too gory” and nimble retreat convert severity into laughter—that’s the charm.
Laying out the plots shows the Lecter saga is really the story of a “monster’s” birth and of those drawn to and contending with it.
This letter may be a kind of “diagnostic report” addressed to that monster.
It’s long, so: to be continued.
