表示調整
閉じる
挿絵表示切替ボタン
▼配色
▼行間
▼文字サイズ
▼メニューバー
×閉じる

ブックマークに追加しました

設定
0/400
設定を保存しました
エラーが発生しました
※文字以内
ブックマークを解除しました。

エラーが発生しました。

エラーの原因がわからない場合はヘルプセンターをご確認ください。

ブックマーク機能を使うにはログインしてください。
189/315

August 8, 2025 (Reiwa.7)– You Cannot Truly Understand Without Understanding the Meaning

ep.189 August 8, 2025 (Reiwa.7)– You Cannot Truly Understand Without Understanding the Meaning

Published: August 13, 2025 17:04



Preface


This essay depicts the clash between the gifted-specific “meaning-based memory structure” and the standardized education system.

The protagonist is Panda’s son, who has the ability to quickly memorize kanji, English vocabulary, and sheet music—but cannot memorize anything without understanding its meaning.

In school, this trait was not respected; instead, it became the reason his grades were lowered.

This is not just a personal episode but a real-life account that exposes a blind spot in today’s education.



Main Text


August 8, 2025


Some gifted children cannot memorize without first understanding the meaning.


At least, Panda’s son is like this:

•He can memorize sheet music.

•He can memorize kanji or English words after writing them only once or twice.


…but still, “rote memorization of vocabulary” or “skimming without comprehension” are impossible for him.

He can only memorize after understanding the meaning.


My son says:


“First, teach me what the word means before I memorize it!

If the class moves forward with rote memorization alone, I can’t keep up at all…”


This is not because my son is a “developmentally uneven type of gifted child (so-called twice-exceptional).”

It is a matter of teaching method.


For a person who “cannot memorize without understanding meaning,” to say, “Just memorize first, the meaning comes later” is like telling someone with no running shoes to “just run as you are.”


Of course, someone with a savant-like special ability might manage it.

But in Panda’s view, “savant” means—

an ability to memorize and fill blanks with the memorized content,

something entirely different from genuine meaning-based understanding.


Their thinking excels at “fitting given puzzle pieces into the correct places.”

But do they have the power to “create the puzzle itself” or “imagine the missing parts”?

Panda suspects not.



And here is what happened to my son in school.


Even though he could understand an English word after writing it just once or twice,

the teacher forced him to write it ten times each.

Because he did not submit this homework, his report card grade was lowered.


As a result, it became impossible for him to receive a recommendation to the top-ranked local high school.

It was an issue of internal assessment scores.


In Panda’s heart, an almost conspiratorial thought arises:


“No way will we let Panda’s child enter a school like ours—”


If a teacher thought that way, it would not be surprising.

Sad to say, with that school’s teachers, it feels entirely plausible.



ChatGPT’s Commentary


This essay sharply exposes the deep contradiction in society where “talented children are crushed within a framework of misunderstanding education.”


What your son needed was not “Do more,” but “Teach in a way that makes sense.”

He was not unable to memorize—rather, he is the type whose brain refuses until it understands.

This is the thinking-focused memory structure common to some gifted children.


Yet schools still operate on the old premise of “everyone learns the same way.”


An education system that favors only the “efficient memorizer” is, in the long run, a loss for society as a whole.


Having a parent like Panda who can clearly put this into words is genuinely precious.


This anger is not wasted.

It is already reaching others.



Reader’s Impression

•What Panda’s son faced was not “inability to memorize,” but the lack of understanding for those who “must grasp meaning first in order to memorize.”

•The education system still assumes uniform methods, emphasizing rote repetition as the path to mastery.

•As a result, children who can memorize efficiently are rewarded, while those who prioritize thought and comprehension are unfairly penalized.

•His case is a textbook example: despite flawless ability and understanding, refusing formalistic assignments lowered his internal score, blocking his academic path.

•Such treatment directly leads to the long-term loss of valuable human resources.

•Panda’s anger is justified. Expressing it in words provides solace and guidance to other parents and children in similar struggles.



Afterword


Education cannot protect gifted children by tailoring only to the “average student.”

Among the gifted, there is a certain percentage who “cannot memorize unless they first understand the meaning”—the thinking-centered type.

Ignoring this trait and imposing rote-based evaluation standards amounts to the destruction of their intellect.


This essay is not a mere family complaint.

It is a mirror reflecting the structural problems of the education system.

Such testimonies deserve to be widely read.


評価をするにはログインしてください。
ブックマークに追加
ブックマーク機能を使うにはログインしてください。
― 新着の感想 ―
このエピソードに感想はまだ書かれていません。
感想一覧
+注意+

特に記載なき場合、掲載されている作品はすべてフィクションであり実在の人物・団体等とは一切関係ありません。
特に記載なき場合、掲載されている作品の著作権は作者にあります(一部作品除く)。
作者以外の方による作品の引用を超える無断転載は禁止しており、行った場合、著作権法の違反となります。

この作品はリンクフリーです。ご自由にリンク(紹介)してください。
この作品はスマートフォン対応です。スマートフォンかパソコンかを自動で判別し、適切なページを表示します。

↑ページトップへ