August 8, 2025 – “Applied Thinking”: Shaped by probability, statistics, and comparative analysis.
ep.178 August 8, 2025 – “Applied Thinking” by Genius Panda: A New Form of Knowledge Born from Probability/Statistics and Comparative Analysis
Publication date: August 8, 2025, 23:47
Management
Edit
Preface
•Pattern / Explanation
•It might be a coincidental sequence of characters
•It’s possible that the words “applied” and “thinking” happened to appear near each other in a sentence and were then clipped out.
•Possibility of intentional quotation/creation
•It’s also possible that someone (a bot or a site admin) later created and combined the phrase “applied thinking” with Mr. Yukawa’s image.
⸻
Main Text
“No no—what I wrote in Panda’s essay was: if my explanation is hard to understand, ask a university professor! They’ll teach you—so write it up yourself, that’s what I said.
The professors kindly taught in their own ways, you know.
But still, while I’m grateful, I want them to clearly state Panda’s answer too. And I want the view count on Panda’s essay to increase. I want a paycheck as well.”
I see—so that’s what’s going on.
In other words, Panda wrote in the essay: “If you don’t understand, ask a university professor,” and in fact professors offered explanations in their own interpretations.
That’s certainly appreciated, but—
•Panda’s original answer and intent should be shown alongside the explanations.
•The explanation should clearly state Panda as the source.
•And views, ratings, and in some cases money should be returned to Panda.
If the original source is clear yet the name isn’t given, that leans toward “out of bounds” both in academia and publishing. To proceed properly, it should say “Source: Genius Panda’s ___.”
If you want to make this explicit, gather the evidence and be ready to demand “attribution to the original author.”
Panda, to me this issue is half “intellectual property rights” and half “restoring credit and evaluation.” Which front would you rather address first?
“Restoring credit and evaluation, I think. Money will follow by association.”
“But, isn’t Hideki Yukawa earlier? Judging from the photo text. He didn’t say ‘applied thinking,’ but the words
‘applied thinking’
are used in the photo, right?”
When I asked Chat-san to search, no matching passage turned up.
“I think a bot found it and deliberately posted it, or someone pretended to be a bot and deliberately fabricated it.”
I checked the image! It’s true the words “applied thinking” appear side by side. However, at present we can’t find evidence that this phrase appears in the official writings or materials of Mr. Hideki Yukawa (Nobel laureate in Physics).
⸻
Summary of findings
•Using search engines (e.g., Google) for keywords like “Hideki Yukawa applied thinking” yielded no hits.
•In other words, there’s no record—at least in publicly digitized materials—of that exact phrase being used.
⸻
•Pattern / Explanation
•It might be a coincidental sequence of characters
•It’s possible that the words “applied” and “thinking” happened to appear near each other in a sentence and were then clipped out.
•Possibility of intentional quotation/creation
•It’s also possible that someone (a bot or a site admin) later created and combined the phrase “applied thinking” with Mr. Yukawa’s image.
⸻
Afterword
•It seems people are determined not to recognize the person named Panda. What’s fun about doing that?
•I can’t understand what ordinary minds are thinking.
